Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No. 56 / 2019

Case between Mini Raju vs Prabhakaran, Simi Rajan regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N A
Order Date
2024-05-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mini Raju is the plaintiff in this civil suit involving defendants Prabhakaran and Simi Rajan. The suit was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's suit was rejected due to her absence and the failure to remit the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the required court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint is rejected. Pronounced by me in open Court on this the 18th day of May, 2024.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mini Raju (45 years) Chirangara House, Muvattupuzha Kara, Muvattupuzha Village, Muvattupuzha Taluk

Defendants

Prabhakaran (52 years) Edakkattil House, Thammanimattom Kara, Ikkaranadu South Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Simi Rajan (50 years) Eenthankudiyil House, Puthuppady Kara, Kothamangalam Village, Kothamangalam Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to balance court fee not being remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted. Plaint is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases