Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 236/2025

Case between Mini Joseph @ Mini Arvind Kumar et al vs Gabriel et al regarding interim injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Mini Joseph and Arvind Kumar, sought an interim injunction to prevent the defendants, Gabriel and others, from trespassing on their property. The court examined claims of ownership and rights of way, ultimately dismissing the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for interim injunction, asserting that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favored the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The respondents have a right of way by easement, as they have been using the pathway since 1995.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) Petition is dismissed. 2) Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mini Joseph @ Mini Arvind Kumar (56 years years) CC No. 47/1705 B, Kuzhuveli Temple Road, Chalikkavattom P O, Vennala, Pin- 682028, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Arvind Kumar (75 years years) CC No. 47/1705 B, Kuzhuveli Temple Road, Chalikkavattom P O, Vennala, Pin- 682028, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Gabriel (63 years years) Pathappillil House, Near Arakkakadavu Juma-Masjid, Vennala Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Vennala P O, Pin- 682028, Ernakulam District John (59 years years) Pathappillil House, Near Arakkakadavu Juma-Masjid, Vennala Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Vennala P O, Pin- 682028, Ernakulam District Jacob (53 years years) Pathappillil House, Near Arakkakadavu Juma-Masjid, Vennala Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Vennala P O, Pin- 682028, Ernakulam District Henry (57 years years) Pathappillil House, Near Arakkakadavu Juma-Masjid, Vennala Desom, Edappally South Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Vennala P O, Pin- 682028, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Temporary injunction sought to prevent respondents from trespassing.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the ownership of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rectification Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the sale deed of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the land tax payment in the name of the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Location Plan Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides location details of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Possession and Non-Attachment Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the possession of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Police Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the trespass incident reported by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the property history of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the property history of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the property history of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the property history of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes property rights pertinent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes property rights pertinent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Disability Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents the health condition of one of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details the current state and boundaries of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation accompanying the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Further examination and report related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation accompanying the second commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases