Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1095/2022

Case between Mini C Philip vs Smt.Ammini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mini C Philip is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Smt.Ammini and Shri Lakshmanan, who are accused of attempting to encroach upon her property. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and unauthorized use of land.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants and ordering them to reconstruct the demolished boundary wall.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction for reconstruction of the boundary wall.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants and ordering them to reconstruct the demolished boundary wall.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents presented by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents presented by the plaintiff satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, a) The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and his men or his agents from doing any act which is determinant to the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mini C Philip
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt.Ammini
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shri Lakshmanan
Party Age
65
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of the Sale deed no. 2055/17, Photocopy of sketch, Photocopy of the location sketch issued by Mulanthuruthy village, Photocopy of the possession certificate no. 41944460, True copy of tax receipt no KL070210000 78/2014.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raju Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sindhu R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jose Kuriakose K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants from trespassing on the plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and his men or his agents from doing any act which is determinant to the peaceful enjoyment and possession of the plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the defendants to reconstruct the demolished boundary wall.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed by a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to construct the boundary wall demolished by then.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves plaintiff's ownership and possession of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides visual representation of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Is issued by Mulanthuruthy village, confirming the location of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as a proof of tax payments linked to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Testimony provided by the plaintiff regarding property encroachment.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mini C Philip vs Smt.Ammini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Mini C Philip vs Smt.Ammini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won