Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Miczo Kft and MPW Workforce Private Ltd., allege that the defendant, Ajith Francis, violated the terms of his employment by leaving without notice. They seek compensation for the losses incurred due to his actions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 2,32,389 with 6% future interest p.a.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 2,32,389 along with 6% future interest from the date of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged proof of their claims through affidavits and documents.
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged proof of their claims through affidavits and documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged proof of their claims through affidavits and documents.
The plaintiffs provided unchallenged proof of their claims through affidavits and documents.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,32,389/- with 6% future interest p.a. from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Miczo Kft
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MPW Workforce Private Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajith Francis
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Power of Attorney, Original Employers under taking, Photocopy of the travel ticket, Photocopy of the work visa, Photocopy of the payroll slip, Returned registered cover with AD card, Copy of legal notice issued by plaintiff to defendant.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vipin P Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adarsh Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Merline Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Celine John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreelakshmi G
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mehnaz P Mohanan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anirudh G Kamath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,32,389/- with 6% future interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.2,32,389/-(Rupees two lakhs thirty two thousand three hundred and eighty nine only) with 6% future interest p.a. from the date of suit (ie, from 30.05.2023) till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Power of Attorney document presented by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Employer's Undertaking
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Employers under taking between defendant and the 1st plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Travel Ticket
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the ticket taken by the 1st plaintiff for traveling of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Work Visa
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the work visa of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Payroll Slip
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photocopy of the payroll slip of the defendant in the month of August 2022.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Registered Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned registered cover with AD card.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Legal Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of legal notice issued by the 1st plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Evidence provided through the examination of the plaintiff's authorized representative.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Recovery and Damages
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Breach of trust
Case Code
Case between Miczo Kft vs Ajith Francis regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Miczo Kft vs Ajith Francis regarding recovery of money.