Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 433/2023

Case between Miczo Kft et al vs Vinayan Ellathukudy Sivan regarding a civil suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Miczo Kft and MPW Workforce Private Limited are the plaintiffs represented by Ms. Rekha Mol K.C. The defendant is Vinayan Ellathukudy Sivan. The case was about a suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was continuously absent despite a specific direction to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was continuously absent despite a specific direction to appear.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to represent the case led to the dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and failure to represent the case led to the dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiff was absent despite specific directions to appear.

Judgment Evidence:

As plaintiff is continuously absent and as plaintiff is absent despite specific direction to appear and is without representation, suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Miczo Kft
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
MPW Workforce Private Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinayan Ellathukudy Sivan
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vipin P Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adarsh Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Celine John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreelekshmi G
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mehnaz P Mohammed
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anirudh G Kamath
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dileep S Kallar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed due to plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is continuously absent and as plaintiff is absent despite specific direction to appear and is without representation, suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Miczo Kft et al vs Vinayan Ellathukudy Sivan regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Miczo Kft et al vs Vinayan Ellathukudy Sivan regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won