Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 268/2016

Case between Micheal vs Haina et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-22
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 02/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Micheal filed a suit against multiple defendants. The plaintiff was absent with no representation, and the defendants were also absent.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit was filed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit was filed.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. No proof affidavit filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 22nd day of February, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Micheal
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Haina
Party Age
21
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri.Jospeh
Party Age
81
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt.Mary Joseph
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.J.Antony
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.J.Benny
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C.Eldho
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jijo Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Malleenathan M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aneesh James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil R Nath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishna Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sojo J Kallidukkil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N.Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendants absent represented. Hence, Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Micheal vs Haina et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Micheal vs Haina et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won