Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 5/2025

Case between M.I. Ouseph et al vs P.D. Thomas regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, M.I. Ouseph and M.I. Varghese, are seeking an injunction against the respondent P.D. Thomas. The court has granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the respondent from causing any obstruction to the petitioners' access to a specified road.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioners protecting their access to the road specified in the case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the respondent from causing obstruction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioners protecting their access to the road specified in the case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners established a prima facie case warranting an injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners established a prima facie case warranting an injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that petitioners have made out a prima facie case and delay in issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the respondents or his men from fixing any gate at the entrance of the C schedule way or cause any obstruction to the same or change any physical features of the same.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.I. Ouseph
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.I. Varghese
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.D. Thomas
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Govindan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhil Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the respondents or his men from fixing any gate at the entrance of the C schedule way or cause any obstruction to the same.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that petitioners have made out a prima facie case and delay in issuance of notice will defeat the purpose of granting injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.I. Ouseph et al vs P.D. Thomas regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between M.I. Ouseph et al vs P.D. Thomas regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Komalvalliyamma vs Meera et al regarding partition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between P.M.Gopalakrishnan Nair et al vs Adv.P.R.Rajan et al regarding declaration of easement right of way and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anie Ittan W/o Ittan et al vs Kurian S/o Joseph regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won