Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.278/2020

Case between Mercy Andrews et al vs Saji Paul alias Kunjumon et al regarding plaintiffs' suit under Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Mercy Andrews and Molly Andrews, are involved in a civil suit against the defendants, Saji Paul alias Kunjumon and Benny Yohannan. The court rejected the suit due to repeated absence of the plaintiff and failure to cure court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiffs' case due to their absence and a failure to address the shortage of court fees. Defendants did not attend the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

The suit rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mercy Andrews (54 years) Valiyaveettil House, Thiruvankulam.P.O., Thiruvankulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 305. Molly Andrews (58 years) Marikudiyil House, Vadavucode.P.O., Vadavucode Village, Kunnathunad Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 310.

Defendants

Saji Paul alias Kunjumon (50 years) Kakkattil House, Marithazham.P.O., Kulayattikara Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 315. Benny Yohannan (48 years) Kalayithadathil House, Marithazham.P.O., Kulayettikkara Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 315.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit rejected due to absence and non-payment of court fees.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases