Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL PETITION (PAUPER) NO. 1 OF 2017

Case between Menothiyil Sreenivasan vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding debt repayment dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-28
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner seeks relief against a company and individuals for non-repayment of a loan provided to expand a gold business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the petitioner as a pauper was allowed. The petitioner was considered indigent and granted permission to file the suit without paying court fees.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to file suit as a pauper
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the petitioner as a pauper was allowed. The petitioner was considered indigent and granted permission to file the suit without paying court fees.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was considered indigent with no means to pay the court fees and hence was granted permission to file the suit without payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was considered indigent with no means to pay the court fees and hence was granted permission to file the suit without payment.
Supporting Evidence
Petition filed by the petitioner seeking permission to sue as forma pauperis.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Menothiyil Sreenivasan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o. Govindan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt.) Ltd
Relation
Represented by its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o. Sukumaran Unni
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shafeekh
Relation
S/o. Saithalavi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiju
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.K.Sakkariya
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permission to file suit as a pauper
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permission to file the suit without paying court fees
Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Debt repayment dispute
Case Code
Case between Menothiyil Sreenivasan vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding debt repayment dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Menothiyil Sreenivasan vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding debt repayment dispute

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/28/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 11/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won