INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1088 OF 2016

Case between Melepurath Illathiyil Hameed et al vs Pathumma et al regarding property dispute

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

SMT. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2018-03-22

Duration

4 years

Case Closed

Thu, 03/22/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner sought permission to cut and remove shrubs in the schedule property and court allowed it with clear instructions to respondent not to obstruct.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted permission to the petitioner to cut and remove shrubs in the property while instructing the respondent not to obstruct the petitioner.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Permission to cut and remove shrubs in the property

Case Type

Civil Suit - Property Dispute

Final Judgment

The court granted permission to the petitioner to cut and remove shrubs in the property while instructing the respondent not to obstruct the petitioner.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed to cut and remove the shrubs in the petition schedule property and respondent shall not obstruct the petitioner in doing the act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Melepurath Illathiyil Hameed
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pathumma
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. C.R. Kesavan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. A. Mamu
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. C.Shanmughan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown

Outcome: Granted

Description: