O.S. No. 333/2024

Case between Meethianpilla vs Suhara Aboobackar regarding impleading as additional defendant

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR

Judge

Smt. Sumey Chandran

Order Date

2025-09-12

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition by Meethianpilla seeking to be impleaded as an additional defendant in a suit filed by Suhara Aboobackar. The petitioner claims that the plaintiff has obstructed his access to a pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The petition for impleading was dismissed as the court found that the petitioner's grievances were not relevant to the current suit's subject matter.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The petition for impleading was dismissed as the court found that the petitioner's grievances were not relevant to the current suit's subject matter.

Key Reasoning:
The petitioner's grievances do not form part of the controversy in the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner's grievances do not form part of the controversy in the suit.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner does not fall in either category of necessary or proper party whose inclusion is required for adjudication of the issues in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Suhara Aboobackar
Party Age: 56
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vazhakulam Grama panchayath
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Secretary, Vazhakulam Grama Panchayath

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Meethianpilla
Party Age: 72
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K. K. George
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: M. K. Jayapalan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification