Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 47/2021

Case between Meenakshi et al vs Sreeraj et al regarding cancellation of document

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-4 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Meenakshi and Durga, are the daughters of late Jayaraj, seeking to cancel a sale deed executed during their minority. The defendants, who are related to the plaintiffs, purchased the property without court sanction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court cancelled the sale deed pertaining to the plaintiffs' 2/3 share in the property, ruling that it was executed without necessary court sanction while the plaintiffs were minors.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The Sale deed No.3386/2010 of SRO, Ernakulam is cancelled and set aside limitedly, in so far as it relates to the 2/3rd share of the plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court cancelled the sale deed pertaining to the plaintiffs' 2/3 share in the property, ruling that it was executed without necessary court sanction while the plaintiffs were minors.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The sale deed was found to be a sham document executed without court approval while the plaintiffs were minors.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The sale deed was found to be a sham document executed without court approval while the plaintiffs were minors.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence available and the pleadings on record clearly prove that the execution of the sale deed was not done with any court sanction and the plaintiffs had a right to the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The Sale deed No.3386/2010 of SRO, Ernakulam is cancelled and set aside limitedly, in so far as it relates to the 2/3rd share of the plaintiffs in the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Meenakshi
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Durga
Party Age
18
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreeraj
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Geetha
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saritha
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of the document No. 3092/2010, Certified copy of the document No. 3386/2010
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju A.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Vinuraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Asher Revi Job
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabhu Muralikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vishnu Salesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ralitzine Mendez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Manuraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Cancellation of Sale deed No.3386/2010 of SRO, Ernakulam as it relates to the 2/3rd share of the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The Sale deed No.3386/2010 of SRO, Ernakulam is cancelled and set aside limitedly, in so far as it relates to the 2/3rd share of the plaintiffs in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit are to be recovered from the third defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiffs are entitled to the costs of the suit from the third defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of the document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the partition deed executed among the legal heirs of the deceased Jayaraj.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of the document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a certified copy of the sale deed executed in favor of the 1st and 2nd defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Meenakshi et al vs Sreeraj et al regarding cancellation of document
Case Code Year
Case between Meenakshi et al vs Sreeraj et al regarding cancellation of document

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 10/31/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won