Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
I.A No. 4/2024

Case between MD Sundaram Finance Ltd et al vs Deepa S Vijayan regarding arbitration petition under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Court
MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N.A
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed by MD Sundaram Finance Ltd regarding arbitration clause in agreement with Deepa S Vijayan. Court finds valid and enforceable arbitration clause, directs parties to arbitration.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
Court directs the petition to arbitration in accordance with the valid arbitration clause in the agreement.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Arbitration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Court directs the petition to arbitration in accordance with the valid arbitration clause in the agreement.
Key Reasoning:
No legal bar to reference dispute to arbitration due to valid arbitration clause.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
No legal bar to reference dispute to arbitration due to valid arbitration clause.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
MD Sundaram Finance Ltd
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pramod
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa S Vijayan
Party Age
41
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji K Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haritha Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Athira Appukuttan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Rejection
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff seeks permanent prohibitory injunctions and damages
Evidence:
Respondent also seeks reliefs such as permanent prohibitory injunctions and damages, which, according to them, cannot be granted by an arbitrator.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Arbitration Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the existence of a valid arbitration clause
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Arbitration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between MD Sundaram Finance Ltd et al vs Deepa S Vijayan regarding arbitration petition under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Case Code Year
Case between MD Sundaram Finance Ltd et al vs Deepa S Vijayan regarding arbitration petition under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Quick Facts

Location
Kolenchery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K.R Radhakrishnan vs M/s M.G Electricals et al regarding interim measures in arbitration.
Commercial Court, Pala
Arbitration Petition Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Indusind Bank Ltd vs Akhilesh P.K et al regarding Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
COURT OF THE COMMERCIAL JUDGE/SUBORDINATE JUDGE OF KOZHIKODE
Arbitration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ouseph vs Government of Kerala et al regarding Suit dismissed as not pressed
THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Dismissed
Case between Paul Abraham vs et al regarding Execution Petition
Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between Pepco No.III.19/A vs P.P.Corporation regarding Transfer of Decree
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Execution Petition Unknown