Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by their power of attorney, sought to remove their suit from the list as the first plaintiff is settled abroad. The court found the reasons insufficient and dismissed the case for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff failed to appear or provide sufficient reasons for their absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and represented by power of attorney without sufficient notice or evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and represented by power of attorney without sufficient notice or evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and represented by power of attorney without sufficient notice or evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and represented by power of attorney without sufficient notice or evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs had enough time to plan for appearance and adduce evidence. No bonafides is seen from the side of the plaintiff to contest the suit by adducing evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.C.Mathew
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o M.E.Chacko
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajith Mathews
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o K.O.Mathew
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarakutty Ajith Mathew
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W.o Ajith Mathews
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.K.Baby
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.K.Sasi
- Relation
- S/o Kunjan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Inam Settlement Officer (Additional Tahasildar)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santhosh
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o Velayudhan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu alias Babuttan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o Velayudhan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Fazil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saju Thaliath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jithin Paul Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Prabitha C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Fadil Fazil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswathy Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sojo J Kallidukkil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Sreekrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Musthafa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thejalakshmi R.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.C.Mathew et al vs T.K.Baby et al regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between M.C.Mathew et al vs T.K.Baby et al regarding dismissal of suit for default