O.S No. 1071/2025

Case between M.B.Valsala et al vs Sunilkumar regarding civil suit

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2026-01-15

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs M.B.Valsala, C.C.Rekha, and M.C.Nideesh against defendant Sunilkumar. The suit was regarding a civil matter settled through a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Suit decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit has been decreed in terms of the compromise agreement which was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise agreement were lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise agreement were lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Supporting Evidence

Terms of the compromise agreement forming part of the mediation Report found to be lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M.B.Valsala
Party Age: 62
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C.C.Rekha
Party Age: 37
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M.C.Nideesh
Party Age: 32
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sunilkumar
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K.Manu Raj
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

The court perused the mediation report which contains the terms of the compromise agreement.

Reference:

Case Classification