Case Summary
M.B. Thampi is the plaintiff in this case, while U.K. Mammotty and others are the defendants. The case involves a suit that was dismissed as not pressed, following a settlement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case, following a settlement.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
suit is dismissed as not pressed. Attachment in IA 02/2023 is raised.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M.B. Thampi
- Party Age
- 64
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- U.K. Mammotty
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- U.M. Ashkar
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Zainaba
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Denny Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lijo Raju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Learned counsel for plaintiff not pressed the suit. He endorsed it in the plaint. Heard. suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.B. Thampi vs U.K. Mammotty et al regarding a suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between M.B. Thampi vs U.K. Mammotty et al regarding a suit dismissal