Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 201/2021

Case between Maya vs Sini regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
I Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-02-29
Duration
approximately-3 years 7 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Maya filed a suit against Sini seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding a property inherited from her mother. The case revolves around the validity of a will and the rights over the property following the death of various family members.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing into the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of her legal right to the property based on inheritance.

Judgment Evidence:

It is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, their men and agents from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and the residential building.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Maya (47 years) Thekkumkariyil house, P.K.M Road, Kumbalam, Ernakulam, Pin – 682 506

Defendants

Sini (45 years) Ajayanthuruthil house, Kattikunnu village, Chempu P.O, Vaikom, Kottayam District, Pin – 686 608

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
It is decreed by a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, their men and agents from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and the residential building.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the certified copy of the will by the plaintiff's father, which outlines the bequest of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the date of death of the plaintiff's father, which is crucial to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the date of death of the plaintiff's brother, which affects inheritance rights.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the date of death of the plaintiff's mother, which is significant for the inheritance claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Relationship Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the legal heirship of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Loan Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of a loan obtained for construction on the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document includes the loan application and supporting documents related to the loan for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Cooking Gas Connection Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This original document verifies the defendant's connection to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was filed by the advocate commissioner after inspecting the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This sketch was part of the commission report that illustrates the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This photograph was included in the commission report and shows the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 02/19/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases