Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Maya Sunil and others, were involved in a suit against the defendants, Francis and Rohith Sunil, but the plaintiffs remained absent and did not file necessary evidence. As a result, the court dismissed the case for non-prosecution.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiffs' continuous absence and failure to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and provide necessary evidence.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and provide necessary evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and provide necessary evidence.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and provide necessary evidence.
Supporting Evidence
No proof affidavit filed so far. Plaintiff remains absent continuously though posted for evidence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit came up before me for hearing on 01.03.2025... Hence suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Maya Sunil
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.B. Unnikrishnan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vasanthakumari Sasidharan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C.B. Kanakambaran
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunilkumar S
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Francis
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rohith Sunil
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rajagopalan A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nikhil K. Sabu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal A.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prabhu Murali Krishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sarath Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amal A.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Viswanath Salish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Maya Sunil et al vs Francis et al regarding non-prosecution of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Maya Sunil et al vs Francis et al regarding non-prosecution of suit