Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.160/2022

Case between Mathew Varghese vs Shri. Nassar Cheriyil et al regarding declaration and consequential reliefs.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-07-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mathew Varghese is the plaintiff claiming ownership of certain properties. The case involves a dispute over property titles and clearance of prior deeds against the defendants, who are initially attempting to contest the title.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring the disputed Sale Deeds as null and void. This judgment confirms the plaintiff's rightful ownership of the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree is hereby passed declaring that the Sale Deed Nos. 1691/2011, 1692/2011 and 2867/2014 of SRO Edappally as null and void.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established ownership through valid sale documents and the court found the defendants' claims to be baseless.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. A decree is hereby passed declaring that the Sale Deed Nos. 1691/2011, 1692/2011 and 2867/2014 of SRO Edappally as null and void.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mathew Varghese (55 years) Meenathekattil House, Cherukole P.O., Mavelikkara

Defendants

Shri. Nassar Cheriyil (57 years) Ayaril Karikulam House, Azhikode P.O., Kodungallur Smt. Kusumakumari Amma (72 years) Sawgandhikam, Sanathanapuram P.O., Alappuzha-3

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court declared Sale Deed Nos. 1691/2011, 1692/2011, and 2867/2014 as null and void.
Evidence:
A decree is hereby passed declaring that the Sale Deed Nos. 1691/2011, 1692/2011 and 2867/2014 of SRO Edappally as null and void and are not binding on the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certificate of Sale Re-confirmation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further confirms the plaintiff's ownership following a Supreme Court order.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim regarding legal ownership established by the Supreme Court.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows earlier ownership transactions by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document validates the chain of title related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates further ownership transfers related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is part of the contested sales and is referenced in the judgment.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes attempts to transfer rights over the property by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certified copy of Sale Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is relevant to the contested transactions discussed in court.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certified copy of Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the cancelled mutation in favor of the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Certified copy of Thandaper Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows a related account that supports the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Certified Copy of Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to a previous case that is part of the evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Certified copy of written statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the plaintiff's position in the earlier related case.
Reference:
Ext.A23
Document Type: Certified copy of amended written statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document clarifies the plaintiff's claims during the trial.
Reference:
Ext.A24
Document Type: Certified Copy of the plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the original claim filed by the plaintiff outlining the relief sought.
Reference:
Ext.A25

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases