Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.340/2019

Case between Mathew Paul vs Jayapalan regarding counter claim

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by the defendant, Jayapalan, to enlarge the time for filing a counter claim against the plaintiff, Mathew Paul. The defendant contends that the plaintiff has encroached upon a public pathway adjacent to his property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for the counter claim, accepting it with a cost imposed on the plaintiff. The defendant has the right to file the counter claim as the cause of action arose before the written statement was filed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Counter claim accepted with costs of Rs.1000/-
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed as the court found merit in the defendant's claim for a counter claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) Petition is allowed. 2) Counter claim is accepted with costs of Rs.1000/-. Pay costs to plaintiff within 14 days and file memo.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mathew Paul (58 years) Veliparambil House, Kumbalam Desom, Kumbalam Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam

Defendants

Jayapalan (59 years) Pooppana Parambu, Panorama Nagar Road, Near Kettezhathu Kadavu Road, Maradu, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed; Counter claim is accepted.
Evidence:
1) Petition is allowed. 2) Counter claim is accepted with costs of Rs.1000/-.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 09/04/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases