Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. No. 300/2025

Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Mathew Ninan and Leela Mathew as decree holders and Sujith P.S. and Rathna K.V. as judgment debtors. The court passed an order to close the execution petition as the decree holder submitted the key surrendered and stated no further steps were required.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder submitted the key surrendered and indicated that no further steps were required.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the execution petition as the decree holder submitted the key surrendered and indicated that no further steps were required.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder surrendered the keys and indicated that no further steps were necessary.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder surrendered the keys and indicated that no further steps were necessary.
Supporting Evidence
Decree holder submitted key surrendered and no further steps required.

Judgment Evidence:

Execution Petition closed therefore.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew Ninan
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela Mathew
Party Age
81
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujith P.S.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rathna K.V.
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Skaria
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas Matehw Koppara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tomy Paul (Mampilly)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abraham K. John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nithyakala V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sona Benny
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Execution Petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won