Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 834/2023

Case between Mathew Joseph vs Sumitra. R et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-24
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mathew Joseph filed a suit against Sumitra. R and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and failure to take necessary steps.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to represent or take necessary action.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps as directed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mathew Joseph (53 years) Kannattu House, Keippadamugal, Kangarappady, Vadacode, Ernakulam-682 021

Defendants

Sumitra. R (34 years) Chalithara Nivarth House, Kodamthuruth, Kuthiathode, Cherthala, Alappuzha-688 533 Caius Morris (58 years) Karumanchery House, Ezhupunna South. P.O, Kodamthuruth, Cherthala, Alappuzha-688 533 Sachin Caius (30 years) Karumanchery House, Ezhupunna South. P.O, Kodamthuruth, Cherthala, Alappuzha-688 533 Vipin Mary Das (29 years) Koikkal Thodi House, Mayyanad. P.O, Mayyanad, Kollam-691 303

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases