Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 834/2023

Case between Mathew Joseph vs Sumitra. R et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-10-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mathew Joseph filed a suit against Sumitra. R and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's lack of representation and failure to take necessary steps.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to represent or take necessary action.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to represent or take necessary action.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps as directed.
Why Defendant Won:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff failed to appear and take necessary steps as directed.
Supporting Evidence
No representation. No steps seen taken inspite of specific direction to take steps against D1 to D4.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mathew Joseph
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumitra. R
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Caius Morris
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sachin Caius
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vipin Mary Das
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Devadas H. Mallan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tezny A.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Harikrishna Dayal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mathew Joseph vs Sumitra. R et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Mathew Joseph vs Sumitra. R et al regarding suit dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won