Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 231/2024

Case between Mathew James vs Upayog Nidhi Limited regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mathew James is the plaintiff in this case against Upayog Nidhi Limited. The matter was brought before the court but was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court heard the matter and concluded that the plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter is not pressed, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the matter, resulting in the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mathew James (76 years years) Kalapurakal House, Flat No.12F, Link Heights, Panampilly Nagar, Ernakulam-36

Defendants

Upayog Nidhi Limited (Age not specified years) 81/485, Kelmers Road, Sreekandath Road, Near VG Safar Hospital, Ravipuram, Ernakulam-682015

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for plaintiff submits matter is not pressed and filed a memo to that effect. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases