Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 567/2000

Case between Mary vs Ammini @ Thressia et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-28
Duration
approximately-24 years 7 months 21 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mary, claims ownership of a property that belonged to her mother and seeks recovery of possession from the defendants, who have occupied the property. The defendants contend that the property rightfully belongs to them due to prior transactions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, declaring her as the owner of the plaint schedule property and entitled to recover possession from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of plaint schedule property shown as plot C3
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her ownership of the plaint schedule property, and the defendants failed to establish any valid claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is decreed as follows: 1) It is hereby declared that the plaintiff has obtained absolute title over the plaint schedule property. 2) Plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of plaint schedule property shown as plot C3 in Ext.C2 (a) plan from 3rd and 4th defendants. C2(a) plan shall from part of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mary (35 years) Thachuthara Parambil House, Vaduthala Desom, Cheranallur Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Defendants

Ammini @ Thressia (46 years) Naduvila Veetil, Manalmukku, N.A.D Post, Choornikara Village, Aluva Taluk Azhruddin (46 years) Muttayil House, Vattakunnamkara, Thrikkakara North Village O E Suhara (45 years) Vattakunnamkara, Thrikkakara North Village Harshad (Age not specified years) Muttayil House, Vattekunnam, Thrikkakara North Village, Edappally North, Pin- 682024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks a declaration of ownership over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get a declaration of her title over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover possession of plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of C3 plot from the 3rd and 4th defendants.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's claim of ownership over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Previous judgment supporting the plaintiff's mother’s title over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Previous decree confirming the rights of the plaintiff's mother over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiff's status as the sole legal heir.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim of possession and enjoyment of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the claim of possession and enjoyment of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the allotment in the family partition.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Alleged fraudulent transfer of property.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Alleged fraudulent transfer of property.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the physical layout of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Foundation of the 2nd defendant's claim of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Reinforces the 2nd defendant’s position regarding property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Important for determining the boundaries and encroachments related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of property boundaries as per commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of property boundaries as per commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C2(b)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Corrected report crucial for the judgment regarding ownership and encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.C2(c)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2000 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases