Case Summary
Mary Vincent filed a petition to restore a previous suit after it was dismissed. The court noted that the petitioner was absent repeatedly during hearings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default due to the frequent absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent repeatedly. Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary Vincent
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Corporation of Cochin
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Kochi
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.B. Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.T. Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ashish Vidyadharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shoban George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the order dated 06.01.2023 and restore the suit
Evidence:
This petition has been come up for hearing before me on 19.01.2024 ... Petition dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mary Vincent vs Corporation of Cochin et al regarding restoration of a suit
Case Code Year
Case between Mary Vincent vs Corporation of Cochin et al regarding restoration of a suit