Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1402/2016

Case between Mary Vincent vs Corporation of Cochin et al regarding restoration of a suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K. Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mary Vincent filed a petition to restore a previous suit after it was dismissed. The court noted that the petitioner was absent repeatedly during hearings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed for default due to the frequent absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner absent repeatedly. Petition dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mary Vincent (67 years) Thypparambil House, Ponnurunni, Vytilla, Kochi – 602 819

Defendants

Corporation of Cochin (Age not specified years) Office of the Corporation of Kochi, Ernakulam The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Kochi (Age not specified years) Zonal Office, Vytilla, Kochi – 682 019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the order dated 06.01.2023 and restore the suit
Evidence:
This petition has been come up for hearing before me on 19.01.2024 ... Petition dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Corporation

Similar Cases