Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1077/2022

Case between Mary Salomy K.A. vs M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mary Salomy K.A., is seeking payment of outstanding rent from the defendants, M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. and K. Balachandran Nair, for a property leased to them. The defendants failed to pay rent that accumulated to Rs. 4,89,029/- despite vacating the premises.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of Rs. 4,89,029/- along with interest and costs. The defendants failed to present any evidence against the claims made by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 4,89,029/- with interest and costs from the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims were uncontroverted, supported by her testimony and documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mary Salomy K.A. (65 years years) Kattunilath House, Providence Road, Ernakulam- 682 018.

Defendants

M/s. Kasal India Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Providence Road, Cochin- 682 018. K. Balachandran Nair (Age not specified years) Providence Road, Cochin-682 018.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.4,89,029/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1.The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 12% per annum from the date of the suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
2.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
3.The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,89,029/- (Rupees Four Lakh Eighty Nine Thousand and Twenty Nine only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
4.The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original lease agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the terms of the lease and the amount of rent due.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was a formal demand for the outstanding rent owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original returned postal envelope along with acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof that the lawyer's notice sent to the defendants was returned as unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral testimony of the plaintiff supported the claims made in the suit.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 07/10/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases