Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 1059/2022

Case between Mary Pious vs Nelson Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mary Pious is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Nelson Joseph, the defendant. The case revolves around ownership and peaceful possession of a property that the defendant has been interfering with despite the plaintiff's lawful ownership.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants are restrained from obstructing the peaceful enjoyment and ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and shop rooms therein.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided satisfactory proof of ownership and established the unlawful interference by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1. Defendants are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory from obstructing the peaceful enjoyment and ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and shop rooms therein.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mary Pious (54 years years) 74/199 (Old no. 45/656B) Vakayil house, Peter Korreya road, Behind Lourde Hospital, Vaduthala, Ernakulam, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 023.

Defendants

Nelson Joseph (60 years years) Kanjiraparambil house, Thevara Desom, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannoor tlauk, Ernakulam District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the peaceful enjoyment and ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and shop rooms therein.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by an order of permanent prohibitory from obstructing the peaceful enjoyment and ownership of the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property and shop rooms therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale certificate no. 3081/19 evidencing the plaintiff's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the gift deed no. 1653/2020, showing the transfer of property ownership to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale deed no. 2200/2022, further establishing the plaintiff's claim to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases