Case Summary
Mary Gladis filed a suit against Sijimol Annamma. The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to the case's dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to the case's dismissal.
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mary Gladis
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sijimol Annamma
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. J Joseph Panikkassery
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. P Jayanthy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N. Asokkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jeemon P Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mary Gladis vs Sijimol Annamma regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Mary Gladis vs Sijimol Annamma regarding dismissal of suit