Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 398 /2020

Case between Mary Gladis vs Anoop, Akhil K Shaji regarding dismissal for default

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mary Gladis, the plaintiff, was absent and unrepresented in court, while the defendants were present. The court dismissed the case for default due to the plaintiff's lack of interest in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not present nor represented.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Gladis
Party Age
69
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoop
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil K Shaji
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P J Joseph Panikkassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shoba Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K A Shaji Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K A Shaji Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's case was dismissed for default due to absence.
Evidence:
the court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the case

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mary Gladis vs Anoop, Akhil K Shaji regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Mary Gladis vs Anoop, Akhil K Shaji regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won