Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 685/2020

Case between Mary Dasan et al vs Henry George et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Mary Dasan and her family, filed a suit for declaration and injunction against the defendant Henry George, who is the brother of the first plaintiff, concerning ownership and possession of certain properties. The counterclaim was filed by the defendant seeking to set aside certain settlement deeds executed by the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring them as the absolute owners of the properties in question and ordering the correction of revenue records. The counterclaim was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of ownership and correction of revenue records.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring them as the absolute owners of the properties in question and ordering the correction of revenue records. The counterclaim was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their ownership and possession of the properties based on valid documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their ownership and possession of the properties based on valid documents.
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts.A1 to A9 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiffs have succeeded in proving their case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (I) It is hereby declared that the plaintiffs 3 and 5 are the absolute owners of plaint A schedule property by virtue of Settlement deed No. 2892/2018... (II) The defendants 1 to 4 are directed to correct the revenue records...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mary Dasan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Francis Betty
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Samson Henry
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bibin Das
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinitha. M
Party Age
35
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The District Collector, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Tahasildar, Taluk Office, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Village Officer, Thazhuthala Village, Kottiyam P.O., Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Survey Deputy Superintendent, Civil Station, Kollam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Henry George
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 71/1982, Land tax receipt dated 06/04/2016, Certified copy of settlement deed No. 2892/2018, Certified copy of settlement deed No. 2893/2018.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sicin G. Mundakkal
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Sam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs 3 and 5 declared as absolute owners of plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiffs 3 and 5 are the absolute owners of plaint A schedule property by virtue of Settlement deed No. 2892/2018.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff 4 declared as absolute owner of plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
The 4th plaintiff is the absolute owner of plaint B schedule property by virtue of settlement deed No. 2893/2018 of Kottiyam SRO.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the 5th defendant from trespassing into plaint A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
The 5th defendant is hereby restrained from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs' other claims for mandatory injunction.
Evidence:
Not specified in detail.
Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Counter claim claims for declaration and setting aside settlement deed.
Evidence:
Counterclaim dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 71/1982 establishing plaintiffs' title over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt dated 06/04/2016 establishing the plaintiffs' tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 2892/2018 supporting the claim of plaintiffs 3 and 5.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No. 2893/2018 supporting the claim of plaintiff 4.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of complaint and receipt filed before Tahasildar, Kollam related to revenue records.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of proceedings No. C11-9712/2013 from the office of Kollam Additional Tahasildar.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of order No. LA-136749/2019 of District Collector, Kollam related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer’s notice dated 12/06/2020.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipts supporting the communication regarding the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mary Dasan et al vs Henry George et al regarding declaration and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mary Dasan et al vs Henry George et al regarding declaration and injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 12/19/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rajesh vs Sarada et al regarding Final Decree for Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won