Case Summary
The case involves decree holders Marriamma Cleetas and Cleetas Antony filing a petition against multiple judgment debtors including M/s.Rudra Publications and B.V. Raveendran. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the parties and no steps taken in the matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the decree holders and judgment debtors, with no steps taken.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
This petition is filed by the Decree holder under Order XXI Rule 10 & 11(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and this petition coming on for hearing before me on 20-08-2025 and the court on the same day passed the following:- ORDER Decree holder absent represented. Judgment debtor 1 and Judgment debtor 2 absent represented. No steps taken. Petition dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Marriamma Cleetas
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Cleetas Antony
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s.Rudra Publications
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B.V. Raveendran
- Relation
- Editor
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B.V. Raveendran
- Relation
- Reporter
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maniamma Gopalan
- Relation
- General Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.G.Joseph
- Party Age
- 58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition dismissed.
Evidence:
No steps taken. Petition dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.NO.
Case Code Year
2025