Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1476/2018

Case between Mariamma. T.K. et al vs K.P.George @ Joy et al regarding non-prosecution.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-03
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 06/03/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Mariamma. T.K. and others, were involved in a suit against K.P.George @ Joy and others. The case was dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of representation from both sides.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel, as well as no filed applications.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their counsel, as well as no filed applications.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for non­prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mariamma. T.K.
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K. Satheesh
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajil Kuriakose
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaji. T.K.
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P.George @ Joy
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P.Paul @ Paul George
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P.Sabu
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P.Antony
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Majo K. Jacob
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shyam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for non­prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mariamma. T.K. et al vs K.P.George @ Joy et al regarding non-prosecution.
Case Code Year
Case between Mariamma. T.K. et al vs K.P.George @ Joy et al regarding non-prosecution.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/03/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won