Case Summary
The case involves Marampally Service Co Operative Bank Ltd. as the decree holder and Subramanian C. M. along with other judgment debtors. The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was found satisfied and dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was dismissed as it was not pressed.
The execution petition was dismissed as it was not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution petition was dismissed as it was not pressed.
The execution petition was dismissed as it was not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
EP satisfied. Memo filed. EP dismissed as not Pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
EP dismissed as not Pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Marampally Service Co Operative Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subramanian C. M.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anilash P. A.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopalan C. M.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- K. N. Madhava Pai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- K. Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP dismissed as not Pressed.
Evidence:
EP satisfied. Memo filed. EP dismissed as not Pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Marampally Service Co Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Subramanian C. M. et al regarding dismissal of execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Marampally Service Co Operative Bank Ltd. et al vs Subramanian C. M. et al regarding dismissal of execution petition.