O.S. No. 159/2022

Case between Manoj Menon vs Aneeb Ali Karumburikkal et al regarding Suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Court

II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam

Judge

Maneesha K Bhadran

Order Date

2024-03-22

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manoj Menon is the plaintiff, and the defendants are Aneeb Ali Karumburikkal, Mohammed Afil.P.P., and Minhal.P.P. The case involves a suit that was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide representation despite multiple opportunities.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide representation despite multiple opportunities.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Steps not taken as directed inspite of repeated opportunities.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Manoj Menon
Party Age: 59
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aneeb Ali Karumburikkal
Party Age: 20
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mohammed Afil.P.P.
Party Age: 20
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Minhal.P.P.
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: B.Ramachandran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Christabel.D.Avravu
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Govind.P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and no representation.

Evidence: