Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 159/2022

Case between Manoj Menon vs Aneeb Ali Karumburikkal et al regarding Suit filed under Section 26 r/w Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manoj Menon is the plaintiff, and the defendants are Aneeb Ali Karumburikkal, Mohammed Afil.P.P., and Minhal.P.P. The case involves a suit that was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear or provide representation despite multiple opportunities.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Manoj Menon (59 years) 215 A, Padmavathi.A., King’s Road, Near Nirman, Jaipur and Presently residing at PKRA 74, Kamala Nivas, Shariyil Road, Eroor, Pin – 682 306

Defendants

Aneeb Ali Karumburikkal (20 years) Keepillattu House, Nadukkara, Peruvallur, Maluppuram – 673 638 Mohammed Afil.P.P. (20 years) Palakkapallil Akkara House, Vellumvumbram.P.O., Pooklollut, Malapuram – 673 642 Minhal.P.P. (Age not specified years) 8/512, Chaalikkara, Nochad, Chinoli Perambra – 673 525

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases