Case Summary
The plaintiff, Manoj Kumar, is engaged in the business of car accessories and is seeking to recover amounts owed by the defendants, N.C.S.Autohub Pvt. Ltd. and its Managing Director Raju George. The defendants purchased accessories on credit but failed to repay the debts despite repeated requests.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,30,902 with further interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till the date of payment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹2,30,902 along with interest from the defendants. The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's failure to contest the claims.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendants owed the claimed amount, with no evidence provided to the contrary.
The plaintiff proved that the defendants owed the claimed amount, with no evidence provided to the contrary.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's evidence remains unchallenged. There is no contra evidence on record.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹2,30,902 with further interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of suit till the date of payment from the defendant and his assets.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manoj Kumar
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N.C.S.Autohub Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju George
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- Managing Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Statement of Bills, Advocate Notice, Returned Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipts, Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.A. Jayaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 2,30,902/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled for a decree for realization of 2,30,902/- from the defendants as prayed for.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Statement of Bills
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the evidence of the amounts due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was sent to the defendants requesting payment of the due amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Returned lawyer notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the notice sent to the second defendant was returned unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Postal Receipts
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts were provided as proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card confirms receipt of the notice by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Manoj Kumar vs N.C.S.Autohub Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Manoj Kumar vs N.C.S.Autohub Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding recovery of money.