Case Summary
The case involves Manju Radakrishnan and Radhakrishnan Nair as decree holders, and Hari G as the judgment debtor. The court addressed the execution petition and reported that delivery has been effected.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court reported that the delivery has been successfully effected and the execution petition is closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manju Radakrishnan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhakrishnan Nair
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hari G
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- C/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Sreekala C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Jinimol P.M.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Hashmi Thaha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manju Radakrishnan et al vs Hari G regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Manju Radakrishnan et al vs Hari G regarding Execution Petition