Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 343/2024

Case between Manilal vs Santhosh et al regarding Realisation of Money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Manilal has filed suit against defendants Santhosh and Sreelatha for the realisation of money. The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's case due to non-remittance of the court fee. The plaint has been rejected.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's case due to non-remittance of the court fee. The plaint has been rejected.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to remit balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not ready to remit Balance Court Fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manilal
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreelatha
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chithra.B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhusoodanan.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arya.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gokul P.Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit filed by the plaintiff for Realisation of Money.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11(c) of Civil Procedure Code.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Recovery of Money
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Manilal vs Santhosh et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Manilal vs Santhosh et al regarding Realisation of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Jomi.M.Johnson et al regarding Realisation of Money.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binu Dev vs Ramanan regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh Mohan vs Jyothikumar regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sabarinatha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhilash Aravindakshan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won