Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 228/2022

Case between Maker Village et al vs M/s Technorip Innovations Private Ltd. et al regarding suit filed Under Section 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Maker Village is represented by its Director Dr. Elizabeth Sherly. The case involves a suit filed under civil procedure, but the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the hearing. The defendant was present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Maker Village (Age not specified years) Kerala Technology and Infrastructure Zone, Kinfra Hi Tech Park, Kalamassery, Kochi, Kerala -683 603

Defendants

M/s Technorip Innovations Private Ltd. (Age not specified years) vithayathil house, Kunnukara N, Aduvassery P.O, Aluva, Ernakulam – 683578 Mr.Arun P.M (39 years years) Kombukkara house, Kuttamassery, Aluva, Ernakulam – 683 503 Mr.Tom Victor (30 years years) Vithayathil house, Kunnukara N,Aduvassery P.O, Aluva, Ernakulam – 683 578

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and non-payment of BCf.
Evidence:
No BCf paid. Hence suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases