Case Summary
The plaintiff Maker Village is represented by its Director Dr. Elizabeth Sherly. The case involves a suit filed under civil procedure, but the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff during the hearing. The defendant was present.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, represented. Defendant present.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Maker Village
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Technorip Innovations Private Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Arun P.M
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Tom Victor
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pirappancode V.S.Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akash S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Megha A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.S.Varalakshmi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amritha Priya
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sajan Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Antony Joseph P.J
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rebinson M.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Athira C.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and non-payment of BCf.
Evidence:
No BCf paid. Hence suit rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Maker Village et al vs M/s Technorip Innovations Private Ltd. et al regarding suit filed Under Section 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Case Code Year
Case between Maker Village et al vs M/s Technorip Innovations Private Ltd. et al regarding suit filed Under Section 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure.