Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 722 /2025

Case between Major M G C Nair vs Akhil Murali et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Major M G C Nair is the plaintiff who has filed a petition for temporary injunction against Akhil Murali and others for not repaying a loan. The petitioner contends that the defendants borrowed money from him and failed to repay it, while the defendants deny the allegations.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for temporary injunction was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The court found that there was no evidence showing personal transactions between the parties as alleged.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for temporary injunction was dismissed by the court as the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The court found that there was no evidence showing personal transactions between the parties as alleged.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for the requested injunction.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case for the requested injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the petitioner has failed to establish a case prima facie in his favour, as the amount claimed was shown to have been deposited with the society and not personally to the respondents.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1. The above petition is dismissed. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Major M G C Nair
Party Age
88
Relation
S/o late N Govindan Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil Murali
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o Muraleedharan P R
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muraleedharan P R
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeswari
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o Muraleedharan P R
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice dated 10.06.2025, Various Member Contribution Certificates.
Defendants Documents
Copy of registration certificate of Agri-Tourism Multi State Co-operative Society Ltd., Member Contribution Application forms signed by the plaintiff.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Praveen Chandy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saneej E S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lekha S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition for temporary injunction to attach property before judgment.
Evidence:
The above petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Member Contribution Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificates issued as proof of member contributions to the Agri-Tourism Multi State Co-operative Society Ltd.
Reference:
Exts.A1 to A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued to demand repayment of the amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the service of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows the existence of the Agri-Tourism Multi State Co-operative Society Ltd.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Share Application Form
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Signed by the plaintiff indicating membership in the society.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Member Contribution Application Form
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Signed by the plaintiff for a contribution of Rs. 2 lakhs.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Member Contribution Application Form
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Signed by the plaintiff for a contribution of Rs. 4 lakhs.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Member Contribution Application Form
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Signed by the plaintiff for a contribution of Rs. 1 lakh.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Member Contribution Application Form
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Signed by the plaintiff for a contribution of Rs. 25,000.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the plaintiff for Rs. 4 lakh to the society.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the plaintiff for Rs. 3 lakh to the society.
Reference:
Ext.B8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of Loan
Case Code
Case between Major M G C Nair vs Akhil Murali et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Major M G C Nair vs Akhil Murali et al regarding temporary injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won