Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 155 OF 2018

Case between Majeed vs M/s India Infoline Finance Limited regarding Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Majeed and Saleena, the plaintiffs, are involved in a dispute with M/s India Infoline Finance Limited regarding the charging of exorbitant interest on a vehicle loan. The defendants did not appear in court, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for some relief.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court finds that the defendants have charged exorbitant interest and misused the plaintiff's signed documents. The plaintiff is granted a permanent injunction against the defendants regarding the vehicle in question but is not entitled to other reliefs due to prior arbitration.
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
The defendants are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly taking away the vehicle bearing No. KL -55- M- 6358 from the possession of the plaintiff otherwise than by due process of law.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court finds that the defendants have charged exorbitant interest and misused the plaintiff's signed documents. The plaintiff is granted a permanent injunction against the defendants regarding the vehicle in question but is not entitled to other reliefs due to prior arbitration.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs succeeded because the court recognized the misuse of documents and the unfair interest charges by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs succeeded because the court recognized the misuse of documents and the unfair interest charges by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to appear in the arbitration proceedings, in which Exbt. A2 award was passed. This court has no authority to entertain a dispute already covered under Ext.A2 Arbitration award.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: 1. The defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly taking away the vehicle bearing No. KL -55- M- 6358 from the possession of the plaintiff otherwise than by due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Majeed
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saleena
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s India Infoline Finance Limited
Relation
Rep. By its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s India Infoline Finance Limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s India Infoline Finance Limited
Relation
Rep. By its Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice (Exbt. A1), Arbitration Award (Exbt. A2), various repayment receipts (Exbt. A3 to A14), Certificate of Registration for vehicle No.KL-55-M-6358 (Exbt. A15)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from forcibly taking away the vehicle from the plaintiff's possession.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly taking away the vehicle bearing No. KL -55- M- 6358 from the possession of the plaintiff otherwise than by due process of law.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the defendant demanding the outstanding amount from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arbitration Award
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This award was obtained by the defendant for the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts document the payments made by the plaintiff towards the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3 to Ext.A14
Document Type: Certificate of Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate confirms the registration of the vehicle involved in the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Exorbitant interest on loan
Case Code
Case between Majeed vs M/s India Infoline Finance Limited regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Majeed vs M/s India Infoline Finance Limited regarding Injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Janaki vs Ajeesh Thiruvasseri Purayil regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Lakshmi vs Narayanan et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kadeeja et al vs Usmankutty.K.P et al regarding injunction
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Alavikutty et al vs Ummer et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed vs Kulathur desom regarding injunction
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won