Case Summary
The plaintiff, Majeed P M, a senior citizen and retail cement businessman, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sree Narayana Seva Yogam Kanjiramattom and others, to prevent them from evicting him from a shop room he has occupied since 2011. The defendants are attempting to evict him for alleged construction purposes, but the plaintiff argues this is a pretext to forcibly remove him.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his case showing no intent of eviction through due process by the defendants.
The plaintiff established his case showing no intent of eviction through due process by the defendants.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed on the following terms. Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiff from plaint schedule building bearing No.15/611(old No.10/230 G) of Amballoor Panchayath.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Majeed P M (65 years)
Parakkal, Kulayittikkara Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kanjiramattom P O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682315
Defendants
Sree Narayana Seva Yogam Kanjiramattom (Age not specified years)
Amballoor Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kanjiramattom P O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682315
K K Girijan (55 years)
Amballoor Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kanjiramattom P O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682315
A N Jayan (39 years)
Amballoor Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Kanjiramattom P O, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682315
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from forcibly evicting him.
Evidence:
Hence plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants and their men from forceful eviction of plaintiff from plaint schedule room without due process of law.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendants from demolishing the wall or any portion of the shop-room.
Evidence:
With respect to second relief sought in plaint for restraining defendants and their men from demolishing the wall or any portion of the plaint schedule room or causing any damage to the plaint schedule shop-room, plaintiff has not produced any proof to substantiate his claim.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the defendant demanding the plaintiff to vacate the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A1