Case Summary
Mahtew C. J is the plaintiff, and Rajesh Mathew along with Joysi Rajesh are the defendants. The case was about a suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and no instructions from their counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and as a result, the court dismissed the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. Defendant represented. Counsel for the plaintiff submitted no instruction from the party.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahtew C. J
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh Mathew
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joysi Rajesh
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Satheeshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Manoj George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed as default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahtew C. J vs Rajesh Mathew et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Mahtew C. J vs Rajesh Mathew et al regarding default dismissal of suit