Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.755/2023

Case between Mahin K A vs Santhi R Menon et al regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mahin K A filed a suit against Santhi R Menon and Mini Latheesh seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent unlawful eviction and refund of a deposit. The plaintiff claimed he was misled into leasing a property and faced threats of illegal eviction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the defendants are permanently restrained from forcibly evicting the plaintiff and his family. Additionally, the defendants were ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and costs of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his possession of the property and the nature of the lease agreement through unchallenged evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiff and his family members from the plaint schedule building. 2) Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mahin K A (37 years years) Residential Building No. 47/1622, Perepadam Road, Chalikkavattom, Vennala P O, Kochi- 682028

Defendants

Santhi R Menon (51 years years) Mavungal House, Malipuram P O, Elamkunnapuzha Village, Pin- 682511 Mini Latheesh (50 years years) Mundamparambil House, Shine Road, Vyttila P O, Pin- 682019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiff and his family members from the plaint schedule building.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiff and his family members from the plaint schedule building.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the acknowledgment receipt issued to plaintiff dated 15.06.2023 from Palarivattom Police station.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Contains the report of the Advocate commissioner dated 04.08.2023 showing the lie and nature of the plaint schedule residential building.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases