Case Summary
The case involves Mahesh Kumar Baid as the plaintiff and Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd. and its managing directors as defendants. The parties have reached a settlement and the court has decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has decreed the suit based on a compromise agreement reached between the parties, which allows the plaintiff a refund of the court fee paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the agreement were found lawful.
The terms of the agreement were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the agreement were found lawful.
The terms of the agreement were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the agreement is found lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. Compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mahesh Kumar Baid
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jifin Mudackal Johny
- Relation
- Managing Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jobin Johny
- Relation
- Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Beena N.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ijlal C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun Chand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Majid K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gopika Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vinod Jabar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aleena Johny
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Riyas K.I
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee paid.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Mediation Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The mediation report was reviewed and accepted as part of the court's decision.
Reference:
Document Type:
Compromise agreement
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court decreed the suit based on the terms found in the compromise agreement.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mahesh Kumar Baid vs Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd. et al regarding a compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Mahesh Kumar Baid vs Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd. et al regarding a compromise agreement
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement