Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 908/2023

Case between Mahesh Kumar Baid vs Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd. et al regarding a compromise agreement

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-08-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Mahesh Kumar Baid as the plaintiff and Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd. and its managing directors as defendants. The parties have reached a settlement and the court has decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decreed the suit based on a compromise agreement reached between the parties, which allows the plaintiff a refund of the court fee paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the agreement were found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement. Compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mahesh Kumar Baid (52 years years) hardware Gallery, 32/1840/A, Mammoottil complex, Padivatom,Edappally P.O, Ernakulam – 682 024

Defendants

Eyne Arc Interior Systems Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) 2nd Floor, 14/896, Plot No.60, Mavelipuram, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 030 Jifin Mudackal Johny (Age not specified years) 2nd floor, 14/896, Plot No.60, Mavelipuram, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 030 Jobin Johny (Age not specified years) 2nd floor, 14/896, Plot No.60, Mavelipuram, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff shall be entitled for refund of court fee paid.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The mediation report was reviewed and accepted as part of the court's decision.
Reference:
Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court decreed the suit based on the terms found in the compromise agreement.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases