Case Summary
The plaintiff, Madhu, is involved in a case against the defendant, Deepa, regarding the non-remittance of balance court fees. The court rejected the plaint due to the failure to file an application for extension of time.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint as the balance court fee was not remitted despite the last chance granted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
The plaint was rejected due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
The plaint was rejected due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not remitted inspite of last chance granted. Today also prays. No application seen filed for enlargement of time.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Madhu
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Deepa
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence, plaint rejected under order 7 Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madhu vs Deepa regarding Balance Court Fee
Case Code Year
Case between Madhu vs Deepa regarding Balance Court Fee