Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 255/2018

Case between Madhu Subramanian vs Antony P.M et al regarding civil suit dismissal.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Madhu Subramanian is the plaintiff, and Antony P.M and others are the defendants. The case involves a civil suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court. Consequently, the connected suit OS 236/18 was also dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

This suit having come up before me for hearing on 16.10.2024 in the presence of the said counsels and this court on the same day delivered the following:- Suit dismissed along with connected suit OS 236/18 for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Madhu Subramanian (43 years years) Palakkathadathil house, Chilavannur, Kadavanthra P.O, Kochi – 20

Defendants

Antony P.M (72 years years) House No. 63/220, Puthenthara house, Elamkulam, Kochi – 20 Elizabeth Antony (70 years years) House No. 63/220, Puthenthara house, Elamkulam, Kochi – 20 Teresa Mini Raymond (49 years years) PCNRA – 133, Thirumullavasery, Kollam – 12 Ann Mary K.S (15 years years) Kanapilly house, Ayyappankavu, Kochi – 18 Stanley Joseph (51 years years) Kanapilly House, Ayyappankavu, Kochi – 18

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed along with connected suit OS 236/18 for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Kochi
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases