Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 255/2018

Case between Madhu Subramanian vs Antony P.M et al regarding civil suit dismissal.

Court
I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Madhu Subramanian is the plaintiff, and Antony P.M and others are the defendants. The case involves a civil suit that was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court. Consequently, the connected suit OS 236/18 was also dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court. Consequently, the connected suit OS 236/18 was also dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

This suit having come up before me for hearing on 16.10.2024 in the presence of the said counsels and this court on the same day delivered the following:- Suit dismissed along with connected suit OS 236/18 for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Madhu Subramanian
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony P.M
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Elizabeth Antony
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Teresa Mini Raymond
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ann Mary K.S
Party Age
15
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stanley Joseph
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.N.Harimenon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju A.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Poly Mathai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shibi A.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Gayathri A.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed along with connected suit OS 236/18 for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madhu Subramanian vs Antony P.M et al regarding civil suit dismissal.
Case Code Year
Case between Madhu Subramanian vs Antony P.M et al regarding civil suit dismissal.

Quick Facts

Location
Kochi
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won