Case Summary
The case involves a suit filed by the plaintiff, Madhu H., for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Asokan and Bindhu. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence in court. No representation was made before the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Madhu H.
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asokan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindhu
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.S. Premkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sreelal S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff filed for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madhu H. vs Asokan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Madhu H. vs Asokan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction