Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Madhu and Sudevan, filed a suit for injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and there was no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Madhu
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudevan
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Adarsh
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Anas.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Muhammed Shafeek
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kottiyam.N.Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Injunction U/S.26 Order and Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madhu et al vs Babu et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Madhu et al vs Babu et al regarding Injunction