Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.889/2018

Case between Madaswami vs Aathikka et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-02
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Closed
Fri, 08/02/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Madaswami filed a suit against defendants Aathikka, Basheer, and Salim. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff's counsel declared the matter became infructuous and no proof affidavit was filed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed for default due to lack of evidence from the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed for default due to lack of evidence from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The case was dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The case was dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for the plaintiff submits that matter becomes infructuous. No proof affidavit also filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Madaswami
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aathikka
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basheer
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salim
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.R. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreerekha K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S. Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Solomon Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mathews K. Philip
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default as the matter became infructuous and no proof affidavit was filed.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madaswami vs Aathikka et al regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Madaswami vs Aathikka et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/02/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won