Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.537/2019

Case between Madanmohan Gangadharan et al vs Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance limited et al regarding case dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Madanmohan Gangadharan and Vinod Mohan, were involved in a suit against several defendants including Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance limited. The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiff was continuously absent for the last six postings.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff. No further action had been taken by the plaintiff against the other defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff. No further action had been taken by the plaintiff against the other defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff continuously failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff continuously failed to appear in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff is continuously absent for the last 6 postings.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Madanmohan Gangadharan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod Mohan
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance limited
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muthoot Motors
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiva Motorcorp
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Authorized Officer, Jaguar Land Rover India Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anwar C.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John Prakash B.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kiran Jose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Madanmohan Gangadharan et al vs Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance limited et al regarding case dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Madanmohan Gangadharan et al vs Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance limited et al regarding case dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won